After reading a couple of books and magazines on traits of leaders, I am left wondering... can leaders be nice? It is always mentioned that leaders take a had stance of "my way or the highway". They are driven by a dream and align people to what the dream is. They run an organization to make sure that it is ahead of its times, and functioning smoothly at all times. They pay attention to little things (aesthetics, appearance etc.) of their organization. They know when to say what.
This now points me to the question - can leaders be nice to the employees of an organization? Employees are almost always in the firing line. Being a hard-ass is almost an inherent capability of a leader. Does being a hard-ass necessarily mean that they cannot afford to let down their weapons?
Personally, I believe that leaders can be nice. They can treat employees with respect, they can mingle with them like they are peers - we have innumerable examples for this. But, there is a thing or two to note here. From a leaders perspective, she should know where to draw the lines. When the question of aligning to the objectives of the dream, or challenging core values arises, leaders are expected to take a hard stand. They must make sure that while it is very important to maintain good relationships with the team members, it is equally important that no compromises happen on the core values of the dream. They must know where they need to be soft, and where they need to be snotty.
From the employees perspective, it is equally important to draw the line too. They must know their limits, and they must realize that even though they are all working hard to achieve a common goal, there is always that "something extra" that their leader has. It's like a chef in a hotel, who finally adds in a magic touch to anything that she makes. There is always a secret sauce which the leader carries. Not that it is a "secret secret", but there is always some thing which the employees have not thought about, which the leader has. Not realizing this generally leads to a lot of issues. Right from assuming equality at all stages - responsibility and pay-wise, to assuming superiority over the leader. Note that good leaders always hire people better than them in a specific vertical - so it is natural for employees to feel superior than the leader - but it should be in their own vertical. The boss always has collective knowledge of a ton of things and that is why they are where they are.
I believe that the collective result of mutual respect and co-existence of employees and leaders makes the leader a nice person in general. It is not a single person's responsibility. Would like to know your insights too.
This now points me to the question - can leaders be nice to the employees of an organization? Employees are almost always in the firing line. Being a hard-ass is almost an inherent capability of a leader. Does being a hard-ass necessarily mean that they cannot afford to let down their weapons?
Personally, I believe that leaders can be nice. They can treat employees with respect, they can mingle with them like they are peers - we have innumerable examples for this. But, there is a thing or two to note here. From a leaders perspective, she should know where to draw the lines. When the question of aligning to the objectives of the dream, or challenging core values arises, leaders are expected to take a hard stand. They must make sure that while it is very important to maintain good relationships with the team members, it is equally important that no compromises happen on the core values of the dream. They must know where they need to be soft, and where they need to be snotty.
From the employees perspective, it is equally important to draw the line too. They must know their limits, and they must realize that even though they are all working hard to achieve a common goal, there is always that "something extra" that their leader has. It's like a chef in a hotel, who finally adds in a magic touch to anything that she makes. There is always a secret sauce which the leader carries. Not that it is a "secret secret", but there is always some thing which the employees have not thought about, which the leader has. Not realizing this generally leads to a lot of issues. Right from assuming equality at all stages - responsibility and pay-wise, to assuming superiority over the leader. Note that good leaders always hire people better than them in a specific vertical - so it is natural for employees to feel superior than the leader - but it should be in their own vertical. The boss always has collective knowledge of a ton of things and that is why they are where they are.
I believe that the collective result of mutual respect and co-existence of employees and leaders makes the leader a nice person in general. It is not a single person's responsibility. Would like to know your insights too.